Five objectives are widely
accepted for enforcement of the criminal law by
punishments: retribution, deterrence, incapacitation,
rehabilitation and restitution. Jurisdictions differ on
the value to be placed on each.
Retribution - Criminals
ought to suffer in some way. This is the most widely
seen goal. Criminals have taken improper advantage, or
inflicted unfair detriment, upon others and
consequently, the criminal law will put criminals at
some unpleasant disadvantage to "balance the scales."
People submit to the law to receive the right not to be
murdered and if people contravene these laws, they
surrender the rights granted to them by the law. Thus,
one who murders may be murdered himself. A related
theory includes the idea of "righting the balance."
Deterrence -
Individual deterrence is aimed toward
the specific offender. The aim is to impose a sufficient
penalty to discourage the offender from criminal
behavior. General deterrence aims at society at large.
By imposing a penalty on those who commit offenses,
other individuals are discouraged from committing those
offenses.
Incapacitation -- Designed
simply to keep criminals away from society so that the
public is protected from their misconduct. This is often
achieved through prison sentences today. The death
penalty or banishment have served the same purpose.
Rehabilitation -
Aims at transforming an offender into
a valuable member of society. Its primary goal is to
prevent further offense by convincing the offender that
their conduct was wrong.
Restitution -
This is a victim-oriented theory of
punishment. The goal is to repair, through state
authority, any hurt inflicted on the victim by the
offender. For example, one who embezzles will be
required to repay the amount improperly acquired.
Restitution is commonly combined with other main goals
of criminal justice and is closely related to concepts
in the civil law.
|
1. Elements
The criminal law generally prohibits
undesirable acts. Thus, proof of a crime requires proof
of some act. Scholars label this the requirement of an
actus reus or guilty act. Some crimes particularly
modern regulatory offenses require no more, and they
are known as strict liability offenses. Nevertheless,
because of the potentially severe consequences of
criminal conviction, judges at common law also sought
proof of an intent to do some bad thing, the mens rea or
guilty mind. As to crimes of which both actus reus and
mens rea are requirements, judges have concluded that
the elements must be present at precisely the same
moment and it is not enough that they occurred
sequentially at different times.
2. Strict liability
Strict liability is a concept normally
applied to civil, not criminal law. It can be described
as liability for harm caused by the defendant,
regardless of mens rea or intent. Not all crimes require
specific intent, and the threshold of culpability
required may be reduced. For example, it might be
sufficient to show that a defendant acted negligently,
rather than intentionally or recklessly. In offenses of
absolute liability, other than the prohibited act, it
may not be necessary to show the act was intentional.
Generally, crimes must include an intentional act, and
"intent" is an element that must be proved in order to
find a crime occurred. The idea of a "strict liability
crime" is an oxymoron. The few exceptions are not truly
crimes at all - but are administrative regulations and
civil penalites are created by statute, such as crimes
against the traffic or highway code.
3. Fatal offenses
A murder, defined broadly, is an
unlawful killing. Unlawful killing is probably the act
most frequently targeted by the criminal law. In many
jurisdictions, the crime of murder is divided into
various gradations of severity, e.g., murder in the
first degree, based on intent. Malice is a required
element of murder. Manslaughter is a lesser variety of
killing committed in the absence of malice, brought
about by reasonable provocation, or diminished capacity.
Involuntary manslaughter, where it is recognized, is a
killing that lacks all but the most attenuated guilty
intent, recklessness.
4. Personal
offenses
Many criminal codes protect the
physical integrity of the body. The crime of battery is
traditionally understood as an unlawful touching,
although this does not include everyday knocks and jolts
to which people silently consent as the result of
presence in a crowd. Creating a fear of imminent battery
is an assault, and also may give rise to criminal
liability. Non-consensual intercourse, or rape, is a
particularly egregious form of battery.
5. Property
offenses
Property often is protected by the
criminal law. Trespassing is unlawful entry onto the
real property of another. Many criminal codes provide
penalties for conversion, embezzlement, theft, all of
which involve deprivations of the value of the property.
Robbery is a theft by force. Fraud in the UK is a breach
of the Fraud Act 2006 by false representation, by
failure to disclose information or by abuse of position.
6. Participatory
offenses
Some criminal codes criminalize
association with a criminal venture or involvement in
criminality that does not actually come to fruition.
Some examples are aiding, abetting, conspiracy, and
attempt. However, in Scotland, the English concept of Aiding
and Abetting is known as Art and
Part Liability. See Glanville Williams,
Textbook of Criminal Law, (London: Stevens & Sons,
1983); Glanville Willaims, Criminal Law the General Part
(London: Stevens & Sons, 1961).
|