|
PROPERTY LAW
|
|
WHAT IS HINDU LAW OF PROPERTY?
|
The Hindu Succession Act,
1956 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted to amend
and codify the law relating to intestate or unwilled
succession, among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs. The
Act lays down a uniform and comprehensive system of
inheritance and succession into one Act.
|
|
WHO ARE THE LEGAL HEIRS?
|
These laws are called "laws of
intestate succession." When a person dies intestate, or
without a will, the laws of the state where he resided
determine how his estate is distributed. According to these
laws, specific family members, or heirs, have a right to
inherit a share of the decedent's property. |
|
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF LEGAL HEIRS?
|
Heir. An individual who
receives an interest in, or ownership of, land, tenements,
or hereditaments from an ancestor who has died intestate,
through the laws of Descent and Distribution. At Common
Law, an heir was the individual appointed by law to
succeed to the estate of an ancestor who died without a
will.
WHAT IS ADVERSE POSSESSION IN INDIAN LAW?
Adverse possession,
sometimes colloquially described as "squatter's rights",
is a legal principle that applies when a person who does
not have legal title to a piece of property usually land
(real property) attempts to claim legal ownership based
upon a history of possession or occupation of the land.
CAN DAUGHTER CLAIM FATHER'S PROPERTY IN
INDIA?
New Delhi: In a Supreme
Court ruling, daughters can only claim their ancestral
property right if 'father' died after the amendment of
Hindu law. ... Earlier, under the Hindu Succession Act,
1956, a daughter was not empowered to inherit rights in
ancestral property.
|
|
|
DOES A MARRIED DAUGHTER HAVE ANY RIGHTS ON
HER FATHER'S PROPERTY?
First of all property have to of your
fathers.! ... The Married daughter have equal right in the
parental property after the advent of amendment in Hindu
Succession Act 1956, that came into force since 9th sept
2005. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, originally didn't
give daughters equal rights to ancestral property.
WHAT ARE PROPERTY RIGHTS ?
Private Property Rights allow people to
fully own and employ their assets, land and
resources without interference from the government or any
other entity or individual(s).
Property rights are natural rights: which is to say that
every individual has an inalienable and moral right over
one s property regardless of whether it is recognized or
adequately protected by the state. Indeed, private
property rights have existed since time immemorial even
before organized form of government came into existence.
To quote French philosopher and economist Frederic
Bastiat: Life, liberty, and property do not exist because
men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that
life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused
men to make laws in the first place.
To be sure, Indians do have a right to property. But for
many Indians, the right is neither properly defined nor
adequately protected. Apart from that, there exist several
regulatory restrictions that prevent individuals from
freely employing their property.
The lack of secure property rights and regulatory
restrictions hurt the poorest among us.
|
While rich people living in cities
have relatively secure titles to their property; the
poor in India s farms, villages and forests do not. If
we can secure strong property rights for the poorest
among us, it will go a long way in helping them to
prosper and escape poverty. Property rights, for
millions of Indians, are either not secure or are not
well-defined. The following is worth noting-
Compulsory Acquisition: In the last few decades, the
state has enlarged the scope of compulsory
acquisition displacing many in the process without
adequate compensation or rehabilitation. This has been
the source of a lot of discontent among the people,
fuelling several grass root movements with people
demanding their rights.
Insecure Titles: Millions of Indians lack a clear title
to their land, and it is hard to establish your title
even if you ve been living on your land for years. For
instance, the land rights of indigenous tribes were not
recognized by the state despite these people living in
the land for generations. It is only recently that this
historical injustice has been addressed to some degree,
but many continue to have insecure titles.
|
|
|
Poor Land Records and
Administration: The state has not only failed in
recognizing the land rights of many citizens, it has also
failed in creating adequate mechanisms for people to
establish their title. Land records are poorly maintained
and are, for most part, not computerized. Land laws are
numerous, cumbersome and hard to comply with. Our land
administration is complicated and needs to be streamlined.
IMPORTANCE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS
One of the determining factors of the
prosperity of a country is the respect and protection it
accords to the property rights of its citizens.
Property rights allow people to be entrepreneurial. And
enterprise allows people to create wealth and prosper. The
security of property allows people to pursue their
enterprise. A farmer, for instance, would not grow crops,
or further develop his land if he knows that his land
faces the threat of being seized by the government. A
businessman would not expand his business if he perceives
a credible threat of his business being taken over by the
state. Individuals would not undertake risks, or make
investments in land improvements if they feel that their
ownership can be challenged. In the absence of a secure
system of property rights, enterprise is throttled.
Indeed, the one determining factor of the prosperity of a
nation is the respect and protection it accords to the
property rights of its citizens.
|
|
PROSPERITY AND PROPERTY
A number of reasons are proposed to explain
the prosperity (or lack thereof) in different countries.
The standard reasons proposed are a country s endowment of
natural resources, population density, geographical
location, state spending in education and healthcare,
cultural values and a variety of other factors. When we go
on to examine each of these factors, none of them manage
to adequately explain why some countries are rich while
others remain poor. Take the case of Singapore and Hong
Kong. Both countries are city states, virtually devoid of
natural resources. Yet, they are some of the most
prosperous regions in the world. The case of South Korea
is particularly astonishing: after being devastated in the
Korean War in the 1950s, it has today in the space of a
few short decades emerged as one of the most developed
nations in the world. There are then, many anomalies when
it comes to development countries that prosper despite the
lack of resources (Hong Kong); and countries that do not
despite being rich in oil (Argentina). Likewise, there are
some countries with high population densities that perform
better than countries with low populating densities.
Anomalies abound.
|
|
|
|